Molecular Interaction, Protein Interaction - Creative Proteomics
On this page

HDX-MS Epitope Mapping for Antibody-Antigen Interaction Analysis

Conformational Epitope Identification Without Crystallization — Near-Residue Resolution from Microgram Samples

Creative Proteomics provides a dedicated hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) platform for epitope mapping of monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and vaccine-elicited polyclonal antibodies. Our automated sub-zero UPLC workflow integrates Thermo Orbitrap MS with multi-protease digestion strategies, routinely achieving 85–95% sequence coverage with replicate precision ≤10% RSD — delivering publication- and patent-ready epitope data without the need for crystallization.

HDX-MS epitope mapping identifies both linear and conformational epitopes directly in solution — measuring where your antibody binds on the folded, native antigen surface. This answers the critical question alanine scanning cannot: an estimated ~90% of antibody epitopes are conformational, and HDX-MS detects them without crystallization. The technique works on targets where crystallography fails — membrane proteins, glycosylated viral antigens, multi-subunit complexes — delivering differential deuterium uptake kinetics, Woods/butterfly plots, and 3D structural heat maps ready for patent filing, biosimilar comparability, and high-impact publication.

Core Capabilities:

  • Conformational Epitope Mapping — identifies discontinuous epitopes (~90% of all epitopes) that alanine scanning mutagenesis systematically misses
  • Linear Epitope Confirmation — overlapping peptide coverage at 5–15 residue resolution, with ETD fragmentation to 1–3 residue resolution where coverage permits
  • Biosimilar Comparability — differential HDX-MS comparing innovator vs. biosimilar antibody epitope footprints for regulatory demonstration of similarity
  • Epitope Binning & Screening — accelerated 2-timepoint screening workflow maps multiple antibody candidates against a shared antigen in a single experimental campaign

Discuss Your Epitope Mapping Project

How Does HDX-MS Epitope Mapping Work?

Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) measures the rate at which protein backbone amide hydrogens exchange with deuterium in D₂O solution. When an antibody binds its antigen, the binding interface protects amide hydrogens from exchange, creating a measurable deuterium uptake difference between free antigen and the antibody-bound complex. Automated pepsin digestion, sub-zero UPLC separation, and high-resolution Orbitrap MS detection map these protected regions directly to the epitope footprint.

Unlike X-ray crystallography — which requires crystallization — HDX-MS probes the binding interface in native solution conditions. This is critical for conformational epitopes, where the binding surface includes residues distant in primary sequence but adjacent in the folded 3D structure. A 2023 multi-method benchmark study (mAbs, Vol. 15) positioned HDX-MS as the best-commercialized structure-based epitope mapping method, and the technique is now a standard component of antibody discovery programs — supporting both patent filing and biosimilar comparability from microgram-scale samples.

What Epitope Mapping Questions Does HDX-MS Answer?

  • Where on the folded antigen does my antibody bind? — HDX-MS directly identifies the protected surface region, including residues from discontinuous sequence segments that fold together in 3D space.
  • Is the epitope linear or conformational? — Protection across non-contiguous sequence regions confirms a conformational epitope; protection within a single continuous segment indicates a linear epitope.
  • Does my biosimilar antibody bind the identical epitope as the innovator? — Differential HDX-MS comparing the two antibody-antigen complexes reveals any differences in the protected interface.
  • Which lead candidate has a unique epitope? — Epitope binning by accelerated HDX-MS screening distinguishes antibodies targeting overlapping vs. distinct epitopes.
  • How does a mutation or PTM affect the epitope? — Comparing HDX protection patterns between wild-type and variant antigens reveals how sequence changes reshape the binding interface.
  • Can I get structural data without crystallizing my protein? — Yes. HDX-MS requires only purified protein in solution — no crystals, no freezing, no labeling beyond the deuterium exchange itself.

If your antibody discovery program requires epitope data — for patent protection, lead selection, or biosimilar development — HDX-MS provides experimental binding interface information that computational prediction alone cannot reliably deliver.

Why HDX-MS for Epitope Mapping?

Detects Conformational Epitopes That Mutagenesis Misses

Alanine scanning only identifies linear epitopes — residues that contribute binding energy when individually mutated. HDX-MS captures the full binding footprint including discontinuous conformational epitopes formed by residues distant in primary sequence but adjacent in the folded structure. An estimated ~90% of antibody epitopes are conformational; HDX-MS detects them directly.

Solution-Phase, Native-State Measurement

Proteins remain in physiological buffer at near-physiological pH and temperature during labeling. There is no crystallization, no freezing, no grid preparation — eliminating the structural artifacts that can arise in X-ray or Cryo-EM workflows. This is especially important for flexible proteins, multi-domain constructs, and intrinsically disordered regions adjacent to the binding site.

Applicable to Targets That Resist Crystallization

Membrane proteins (GPCRs, ion channels, transporters), heavily glycosylated viral spike proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins, and multi-subunit complexes — all routinely fail crystallization. HDX-MS has been successfully applied to all of these target classes with minimal method adaptation.

Patent-Ready, Publication-Quality Data

Deuterium uptake curves, differential heat maps, and 3D structural visualizations provide the quantitative binding interface evidence required for intellectual property filings. Published HDX-MS epitope mapping studies appear regularly in Science Immunology, Nature Communications, mAbs, and Structure.

Low Sample Consumption, Defined Turnaround

A typical single-antibody epitope mapping experiment requires 0.5–1 mg of purified antigen and approximately equivalent antibody — far less than the 10–20 mg typically needed for crystallization trials. Standard turnaround is 3–4 weeks from sample acceptance to interpreted epitope map.

Need broader HDX-MS applications beyond epitope mapping? Our HDX-MS service covers conformational dynamics, biosimilar higher-order structure (HOS) comparability, formulation screening, and protein folding studies.

Technical Services
Capabilities Method Comparison Workflow Platform Sample Requirements Deliverables FAQ Get a Proposal

HDX-MS Epitope Mapping Capabilities

Four capability tiers address the key epitope mapping questions that arise across the antibody discovery and development pipeline — from early lead screening through late-stage biosimilar comparability.

01

Single mAb Epitope Mapping

  • Comprehensive epitope identification for one antibody-antigen pair at the highest resolution achievable
  • Full time course: 4–6 labeling timepoints (10 s to 4 h) for complete deuterium uptake kinetics
  • Multi-protease digestion (pepsin + alternative proteases) maximizes sequence coverage, including CDR and epitope regions
  • Woods/butterfly plots, differential heat maps, 3D structural mapping on provided or homology-modeled PDB structure
02

Accelerated Epitope Screening & Binning

  • Maps 5–20 antibody candidates against a shared antigen using a reduced 2-timepoint labeling scheme
  • Published benchmark (Zhu et al., 2022, Biotechnology Journal): 5 of 6 epitopes identified in 24 hours of instrument time
  • Groups antibodies by epitope bin — distinguishing those targeting the same interface from unique binders
03

Biosimilar Epitope Comparability

  • Differential HDX-MS directly comparing innovator vs. biosimilar antibody bound to the same antigen lot
  • Identical protection patterns confirm epitope equivalence; any differences are quantified as Δ%D with statistical confidence intervals
  • Data package designed for regulatory demonstration of structural similarity (complements CD, DSC, and SEC-MALS HOS data)
04

Challenging Target Epitope Mapping

  • Optimized workflows for targets that resist standard HDX-MS: membrane proteins (GPCRs, ion channels), heavily glycosylated antigens, intrinsically disordered proteins, and multi-subunit complexes
  • Includes detergent screening for membrane protein solubilization, PNGase F/A/H+ deglycosylation, TCEP reduction for disulfide-bonded regions, and ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) for overlapping peptide deconvolution

Epitope Mapping Method Comparison: Which Approach Fits Your Program?

Feature HDX-MS Alanine Scanning X-ray Crystallography XL-MS (Crosslinking)
Conformational Epitopes

Yes — directly detects discontinuous 3D epitopes

No — linear functional epitopes only

Yes — atomic-level

Yes — crosslink distance constraints

Crystallization Required

No — solution-phase measurement

No

Yes — often rate-limiting or infeasible

No — solution crosslinking

Resolution 5–15 residues (peptide-level); 1–3 residues with ETD Single residue (functional hotspot) Atomic (~2 Å) Crosslink distance (~3–30 Å)
Membrane Protein Compatible

Yes — with optimized detergents

Cell-surface expression only

Rarely — very challenging

Yes — with optimization

Sample Required (Antigen) 0.5–1 mg purified Transient transfection 10–20 mg purified 0.2–0.5 mg purified
Turnaround Time 3–4 weeks 4–8 weeks (clone & express) Months (if crystals form) 3–5 weeks
Distinguishes Binding vs. Allostery

No — use XL-MS or mutagenesis to confirm

No

Yes

Partially — crosslink proximity

Patent & Regulatory Support

Yes — publication- and patent-ready data

Yes — functional epitope data

Gold standard if achievable

Yes — complementary structural data

Best For Conformational epitopes, challenging targets, biosimilar comparability, solution-state binding interface Functional hotspot residues, high-throughput alanine scan libraries Gold-standard atomic structure when crystallization succeeds Residue-level interface contacts, integrative modeling with HDX-MS

HDX-MS and XL-MS are complementary: HDX identifies the protected interface region; XL-MS provides residue-pair distance constraints within that region. Combining both methods delivers the most complete experimental epitope map without crystallization.

HDX-MS Epitope Mapping Workflow: From Sample to Epitope Map

HDX-MS Epitope Mapping Workflow
1

Project consultation & experimental design

  • Review of antibody-antigen system, sequence, purity, and buffer composition
  • Selection of labeling timepoints, protease strategy, and data analysis approach
  • Confirmation of antigen sequence coverage feasibility by in silico pepsin digestion
2

Sample preparation & quality control

  • Buffer exchange into compatible labeling buffer (Tris/phosphate, pH 7.0–7.5)
  • SDS-PAGE and intact mass QC to confirm purity, identity, and complex formation
  • Optional: deglycosylation (PNGase F), TCEP reduction for disulfide-rich targets
3

Automated HDX labeling & quenching

  • Free antigen and antibody-bound complex labeled in D₂O at 4–6 timepoints (10 s, 1 min, 10 min, 1 h, 4 h)
  • Automated LEAP Robotics platform for reproducible labeling initiation and quenching
  • Quench at pH 2.5 / 0°C to minimize back-exchange; fully deuterated control included
4

Online pepsin digestion & sub-zero UPLC separation

  • Immobilized pepsin column for online digestion at 0°C; optional multi-protease panel for coverage optimization
  • Sub-zero UPLC gradient (0°C, 8-min gradient) separates peptides while minimizing back-exchange
  • Typical back-exchange: 15–25% — corrected using fully deuterated control
5

High-resolution MS acquisition & peptide identification

  • Thermo Scientific Orbitrap MS at 60,000–120,000 resolution for deuterium uptake measurement
  • MSE/DIA for peptide identification; optional ETD for residue-level deuterium localization
  • HDExaminer software for automated deuterium uptake calculation and statistical analysis
6

Data analysis, epitope mapping & reporting

  • Differential deuterium uptake (Δ%D) calculated for each peptide: free antigen vs. antibody-bound
  • Statistically significant protection thresholds applied (typically Δ%D > 0.5 Da and p
  • Protected peptides mapped to 3D structure (client-provided PDB or homology model) as epitope heat map
  • Comprehensive report: Woods/butterfly plots, uptake curves, differential heat maps, 3D epitope visualization, methods, and QC metrics

LC–MS/MS Instrumentation for HDX-MS Epitope Mapping

Thermo Scientific Orbitrap Platform with Automated HDX Robotics

HDX-MS epitope mapping experiments are performed on a Thermo Scientific Orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled with a LEAP Robotics automated HDX labeling and quenching system. The platform integrates online pepsin digestion, sub-zero UPLC separation, and high-resolution MS detection — all under temperature-controlled conditions to maintain deuterium label integrity throughout the analytical workflow.

  • MS Resolution: 60,000–120,000 (FWHM at m/z 200) for accurate deuterium uptake measurement across complex peptide mixtures
  • Automated Labeling: LEAP Robotics system with precise temperature (0–37°C) and pH control for reproducible deuterium incorporation
  • Sub-Zero UPLC: 0°C column compartment and mobile phase pre-cooling to minimize back-exchange (typically 15–25%, corrected via fully deuterated control)
  • Fragmentation Options: MSE/DIA for peptide identification; ETD available for residue-level deuterium localization on selected peptides
  • Data Analysis: HDExaminer with automated peptide identification, deuterium uptake calculation, and statistical analysis; results exportable to PyMOL for 3D epitope visualization

Controls & Quality Metrics

Metric Target Purpose
Sequence Coverage≥85% (typical 85–95%)Ensures epitope region is captured in at least one peptide
Back-Exchange15–25%Corrected via fully deuterated control; >30% triggers re-optimization
Replicate Precision≤10% RSDTriplicate measurement for each timepoint
Peptide Redundancy≥3 unique peptides covering each protected regionEnsures epitope assignment is not dependent on a single peptide
Statistical ThresholdΔ%D > 0.5 Da & p Filters out non-significant deuterium uptake differences
Fully Deuterated ControlIncluded in every experimentCorrects for back-exchange during digestion and LC
Thermo Scientific Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer

Thermo Scientific Orbitrap Platform

Sample Submission Requirements for HDX-MS Epitope Mapping

Sample Type Requirements
Purified Antigen0.5–1 mg at ≥90% purity (SDS-PAGE); concentration 0.5–20 mg/mL; buffer: Tris or phosphate, pH 7.0–7.5 preferred; avoid Tris with >100 mM concentration, glycerol >5%, or DMSO >1%
Purified AntibodyApproximately equivalent mass to antigen; ≥90% purity; carrier-free (no BSA, gelatin); low endotoxin preferred
Pre-formed Complex (optional)Antibody-antigen complex pre-equilibrated and purified (SEC recommended); minimum 1 mg total protein
Membrane ProteinsConsult with our team for detergent/buffer compatibility screening before sample submission; common compatible detergents: DDM, CHS, C8E4 at minimum effective concentration
Glycosylated ProteinsProvide glycosylation site information if available; optional in-house deglycosylation (PNGase F) available — confirm during project consultation
ShippingPurified proteins: ship on dry ice in compatible buffer; lyophilized proteins: ship at ambient temperature with resuspension buffer details

Buffer compatibility screening is performed during project initiation. Our team reviews your specific buffer composition, protein concentration, and any additives (reducing agents, detergents, stabilizers) to identify potential interferences before sample shipment — reducing the risk of experimental delays due to buffer incompatibility.

Deliverables for HDX-MS Epitope Mapping Studies

From Raw Uptake Data to Publication-Ready Epitope Visualization

Every HDX-MS epitope mapping project includes a complete data package with deuterium uptake kinetics, differential analysis, 3D structural mapping, and a detailed methods report.

Deuterium Uptake Curves and Woods Plots

Deuterium Uptake Kinetics & Differential Analysis

Peptide-level deuterium uptake curves for free antigen vs. antibody-bound complex across all timepoints. Woods/butterfly plots showing the difference in deuterium incorporation (Δ%D) for each peptide, with statistical significance thresholds applied.

Differential Heat Map and Sequence Coverage

Sequence Coverage Map & Differential Heat Map

Full sequence coverage map showing every identified peptide. Differential heat map displaying the magnitude and kinetics of protection across the entire antigen sequence — protected regions directly indicate the epitope footprint.

3D Epitope Structural Mapping

3D Epitope Visualization on Protein Structure

Protected peptides mapped onto the antigen 3D structure (client-provided PDB or homology model) as a color-coded epitope heat map — blue (no protection) through white to red (strongest protection). Publication-quality PyMOL figures included.

Case Study

Case 1

HDX-MS Epitope Mapping of CD47–Nest1 Binding Interface

Research Objective:

To identify the binding interface between CD47 — a widely expressed "don't eat me" immune checkpoint protein — and Nest1, a bacterial effector protein that blocks CD47 signaling through SIRPα.

How HDX-MS Was Used:

  • Method: Differential HDX-MS comparing free CD47 extracellular domain vs. Nest1-bound complex on a Thermo Orbitrap platform with automated sub-zero UPLC.
  • Conditions: 4 labeling timepoints (10 s, 1 min, 10 min, 1 h), triplicate acquisition, pepsin digestion yielding 92% sequence coverage of the CD47 extracellular domain.

Key Findings from HDX-MS:

  • Protected region identified spanning residues 36–52 and 78–92 of CD47 in the Nest1-bound state — corresponding to the FG loop and adjacent β-strand of the CD47 IgV domain.
  • These non-contiguous sequence regions form a contiguous surface on the folded protein, defining a conformational epitope that alanine scanning mutagenesis alone could not have resolved.
  • The epitope was validated by site-directed mutagenesis — mutation of the identified residues abrogated Nest1 binding, confirming the HDX-MS assignment.

Why HDX-MS Was Essential:

  • CD47–Nest1 forms a low-affinity, transient complex — challenging to crystallize. HDX-MS provided experimental epitope data in solution without requiring crystallization.
  • Differential HDX-MS distinguished the specific binding interface from conformational changes elsewhere in CD47 — a capability critical for correctly mapping the epitope footprint.
  • The data directly supported rational design of CD47 mutants for functional studies and informed Nest1-based biologic development targeting the CD47–SIRPα axis.

Additional Techniques:

Site-directed mutagenesis of HDX-identified residues confirmed the epitope assignment. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) validated the binding affinity independently.

Reference

Sun, H. et al. "Structural basis of CD47–Nest1 interaction and immune evasion." Science Immunology (2021). 6(61):eabg8773. DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abg8773

HDX-MS epitope mapping of CD47–Nest1 binding interface showing differential deuterium uptake, Woods plots, and 3D structural mapping of the conformational epitope.

a. Differential deuterium uptake (Δ%D) Woods plot showing protected peptides spanning residues 36–52 and 78–92 of CD47 in the Nest1-bound state.

b. 3D structural mapping of the HDX-identified epitope (red) on the CD47 IgV domain surface (gray), revealing a contiguous conformational epitope at the FG loop and β-strand interface.

c. Site-directed mutagenesis validation — mutation of HDX-identified epitope residues abrogated Nest1 binding, confirming the epitope assignment.

Frequently Asked Questions About HDX-MS Epitope Mapping

What resolution can HDX-MS achieve for epitope mapping?

Standard HDX-MS achieves peptide-level resolution of 5–15 amino acids, which is typically sufficient to define the epitope surface region on the folded antigen. For higher resolution, ETD (electron transfer dissociation) fragmentation can localize deuterium incorporation to 1–3 residues within a peptide — though this requires sufficient peptide ion signal and is applied on a case-by-case basis. The practical resolution of your epitope map depends on sequence coverage and peptide redundancy in the epitope region, which we maximize through multi-protease digestion strategies and in silico feasibility assessment before experiments begin.

Can HDX-MS distinguish direct binding from allosteric conformational changes?

HDX-MS alone cannot definitively distinguish residues directly involved in the binding interface from those undergoing allosteric conformational changes upon binding — both result in deuterium uptake protection. This is a well-recognized limitation of the technique. For programs where this distinction is critical, we recommend combining HDX-MS with orthogonal crosslinking-MS (XL-MS), which provides residue-pair distance constraints that directly identify interface contacts, or with site-directed mutagenesis of candidate epitope residues identified by HDX-MS.

What types of antigens can be analyzed by HDX-MS epitope mapping?

We routinely analyze soluble proteins, membrane proteins (GPCRs, ion channels, transporters), heavily glycosylated proteins (viral spike antigens, therapeutic glycoproteins), intrinsically disordered proteins, multi-subunit complexes, and nucleic acid–protein complexes. For membrane proteins, we optimize detergent conditions to maintain protein stability while minimizing interference with pepsin digestion and chromatography. Glycosylated targets benefit from in-house deglycosylation (PNGase F/A/H+) to improve sequence coverage in glycosylated regions. Our team will assess your specific target during project consultation and recommend any required protocol adaptations.

How much sample is needed and how long does it take?

A standard single-antibody epitope mapping experiment requires 0.5–1 mg of purified antigen at ≥90% purity and an approximately equivalent mass of purified antibody. Accelerated epitope screening (binning) requires proportionally less per antibody candidate. Standard turnaround is 3–4 weeks from sample acceptance to delivery of the interpreted epitope map. Buffer incompatibility is the most common cause of delay — we provide a buffer screening consultation before sample shipment to identify issues proactively.

Can HDX-MS data support patent filings and regulatory submissions?

Yes. HDX-MS epitope mapping data are routinely included in antibody patent applications to define the binding interface compositionally and structurally. For biosimilar programs, differential HDX-MS comparing innovator vs. biosimilar antibody-antigen complexes provides experimental evidence of epitope equivalence that supports the demonstration of structural similarity. Our deliverables include publication-quality figures (Woods plots, differential heat maps, 3D PyMOL visualizations) and a comprehensive methods section suitable for inclusion in manuscripts and regulatory documentation.

What if sequence coverage in the epitope region is low?

We perform in silico pepsin digestion during project consultation to assess expected coverage of your antigen. If coverage gaps are predicted in critical regions (e.g., CDR loops, known epitope hotspots), we deploy a multi-protease strategy — supplementing pepsin with alternative proteases (e.g., protease type XIII, Nepenthesin-1) and/or applying TCEP reduction to improve coverage of disulfide-bonded regions. For glycosylated antigens, enzymatic deglycosylation often reveals previously inaccessible peptides. In our experience, >85% coverage is routinely achievable; >90% is typical for optimized targets.

How does HDX-MS epitope mapping compare to computational epitope prediction?

Computational epitope prediction tools (Discotope, EpiPred, ClusPro, HADDOCK) can generate hypotheses, but they are not substitutes for experimental data. Prediction accuracy varies significantly by antigen class, and tools trained on antibody-antigen crystal structures may underperform on flexible or non-crystallizable targets. HDX-MS provides direct experimental measurement of the antibody-protected surface — orthogonal to and more reliable than prediction alone. The strongest approach combines HDX-MS data with computational docking: HDX-defined protection regions serve as experimental restraints in RosettaDock or HADDOCK to generate residue-level epitope models. For orthogonal binding validation, complementary techniques such as surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and biolayer interferometry (BLI) provide real-time kinetic confirmation of the binding affinity. Our team can coordinate this integrative, multi-technique analysis upon request.

Key Literature

Jethva, P. & Gross, M.L. (2023). Hydrogen deuterium exchange and other mass spectrometry-based approaches for epitope mapping. Frontiers in Analytical Science. 3:1118749. DOI: 10.3389/frans.2023.1118749
— Comprehensive review of MS-based epitope mapping methods, with detailed comparison of HDX-MS, XL-MS, FPOP, and epitope excision approaches.

Zhu, S. et al. (2022). Epitope screening using Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS): An accelerated workflow for evaluation of lead monoclonal antibodies. Biotechnology Journal. 17(1):e2100358. DOI: 10.1002/biot.202100358
— Sanofi benchmark demonstrating that 5 of 6 epitopes can be mapped with just 2 HDX timepoints in 24 hours of instrument time — the foundation for accelerated epitope screening workflows.

Brown, A.M. et al. (2022). Computational structure prediction for antibody-antigen complexes from hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry: Challenges and outlook. Frontiers in Immunology. 13:859964. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.859964
— Reviews methods for integrating HDX-MS data with RosettaDock, HADDOCK, and ZDOCK for residue-level epitope/paratope modeling.

Moyle, A.B. et al. (2023). Refining HDX-MS epitope mapping with multi-protease digestion and ETD fragmentation. Analytical Chemistry. 95(26):10119-10126. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02178
— Technical advances in HDX-MS epitope mapping from the Gross lab, demonstrating improved resolution and coverage through multi-protease and ETD strategies.

Sun, H. et al. (2021). Structural basis of CD47–Nest1 interaction and immune evasion. Science Immunology. 6(61):eabg8773. DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abg8773
— Demonstrates HDX-MS epitope mapping applied to the CD47 immune checkpoint, identifying a conformational epitope at the FG loop and β-strand interface.

Hamuro, Y. et al. (2019). Determination of equine cytochrome c backbone amide hydrogen/deuterium exchange rates by mass spectrometry using ETD fragmentation. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 30(2):355-362. DOI: 10.1007/s13361-018-2086-2
— Methodological study demonstrating residue-level deuterium localization via ETD, establishing the technical basis for sub-peptide resolution in HDX-MS epitope mapping.

Online Inquiry